Site seems to be working OK.

Side Gate vs Tube Feed

here is a place to discuss anything related to Henry
Post Reply
Gregorsway

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by Gregorsway » Mon Jan 30, 2017 7:53 am

My brothers and I grew up shooting a Stevens 66b tube-fed .22LR. Can't tell you how many pills we dropped down that throat! It was a plenty! Never had any issues with it.

Grandpa had a Marlin 30-30 side feed and he let me borrow it a time or two to deer hunt. Never had any problems with it either.
Now I own a Henry 45-70 brassy tube feed and I enjoy it- but sometimes it is an adventure getting the tube to slip down over the fat slugs that the 45-70 are! I twist, turn, and pray until it goes. I rang the gong at 100 meters with it Saturday morning and smiled all the way back to the barn.

Henry88

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by Henry88 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:49 am

Gregorsway wrote:My brothers and I grew up shooting a Stevens 66b tube-fed .22LR. Can't tell you how many pills we dropped down that throat! It was a plenty! Never had any issues with it.

Grandpa had a Marlin 30-30 side feed and he let me borrow it a time or two to deer hunt. Never had any problems with it either.
Now I own a Henry 45-70 brassy tube feed and I enjoy it- but sometimes it is an adventure getting the tube to slip down over the fat slugs that the 45-70 are! I twist, turn, and pray until it goes. I rang the gong at 100 meters with it Saturday morning and smiled all the way back to the barn.
^^^ This ^^^

Subconsciously, we associate the tube feed with a .22 and the loading gate with the big guns.

Save the fact the original Henry was tube fed, the Marlin and Winchester guys will have none of it..............

User avatar
Sir Henry
Administrator / Owner
Posts: 14573
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
Location: Price County Wisconsin
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by Sir Henry » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:30 am

Henry88 wrote:
Sir Henry wrote:I prefer a loading gate because that is the way Lucas McCain loaded his Winchester in the opening sequence.
X2 I think the folks at the Marlin forum fancy themselves as Steve McQueen, reloading in the heat of battle, rather than some pre-puberty adolescent loading his Glenfield model 60.
I like to think of myself as a cross between Lucas McCain and Josh Randle.
Hi, my name is Gene and I'm a Henryholic from Wisconsin.

Range Reporter: Henry Repeater

User avatar
steelersfan97
Cowhand
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:34 pm
Location: Parts Unknown
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by steelersfan97 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:45 pm

Tastes Great! Less Filling!
H006M, H015-223

User avatar
RanchRoper
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 12953
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:14 am
Location: Land of Shining Mountains, Alberta
Canada

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by RanchRoper » Fri Feb 03, 2017 5:17 pm

Sir Henry wrote:
Henry88 wrote:
Sir Henry wrote:I prefer a loading gate because that is the way Lucas McCain loaded his Winchester in the opening sequence.
X2 I think the folks at the Marlin forum fancy themselves as Steve McQueen, reloading in the heat of battle, rather than some pre-puberty adolescent loading his Glenfield model 60.
I like to think of myself as a cross between Lucas McCain and Josh Randle.
I'm about 80% Curly and 20% Shemp.

Pedersoli Frontier Flintlock .50
Kibler Colonial Flintlock .50

Ohkínohkomit - Shoot skillfully

ditto1958
Cowboy
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:46 pm
Location: Northeastern Wisconsin
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by ditto1958 » Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:59 pm

Is this horse still dead?

CaliforniaMike

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by CaliforniaMike » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:55 am

I love the tube loading feature and have made my own speed loaders for the 45 LC for my Big Boy. I load them at home (5 loaders X 10 rds each) and head to the range. I can reload in about 15 seconds and with practice can probably get that time down some. I can also unload with the same tubes and not have to drop the rounds on a bench and have them roll around.

JCN
Cowboy
Posts: 1008
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2016 9:02 pm
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by JCN » Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:25 pm

Going to comment a little late because I just saw this thread.

Yes, the biggest gripe I hear on other forums (Calguns specifically) is the lack of loading gate. I've defended the tube loading system many many times!
Henry Big Boy Steel .357 mag

User avatar
JEBar
Town Marshal / Deputy Admin
Posts: 20413
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
Location: central NC
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by JEBar » Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:55 pm

I don't much care what the item or even thought is, some folks will like it and some won't ....

the reality is,

they have no control over what I like nor do I have any control over what the like

they have no right to tell me what I should like/dislike nor do I have any right to tell them what they should like/dislike

I've chosen not to worry about folks who dislike a Henry, what they think is irrelevant

Squatch

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by Squatch » Thu Mar 09, 2017 12:07 am

Bottom line is this. While someone was complaining about no loading gate. Henry just sold a few more made in USA lever guns!

#7 on the hit parade and a family owned business at that. Not some huge holding company like so many other once respected names.

If lack of a loading gate was really that big of a deal would folks be wondering why Henry can't keep the racks full at the local gun store.

Some folks don't know how to deal with the threat of a "new" traditional looking lever gun that is not a copy of anything made in the 1,800's.

red ryder

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by red ryder » Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:17 pm

I just bought my Henry BB .357 after going over the side gate vs. the loading tube issue. My first lever action in the early 90's was a Winchester 94 in .45 LC. It was sent back to Winchester three times b/c of failure to feed rounds. Finally Winchester sent me a check for the purchase price. I added money and bought an Uberti in .45 LC with a 24-1/4" barrel. I soon realized the barrel was too long and so I sold that and bought a Marlin in .45 LC with a color case hardened receiver. Each of these lever actions took skin off my thumb no matter how careful I was. My source to reload .45 LC decided b/c of legal liability to discontinue reloading my saved brass. I sold my beautiful Marlin. Years later I got the itch for another lever action rifle after watching an infomercial with Anthony Imperato, but this time in .357. For over six months I looked for another side loader. Well Marlin doesn't make .357 any more and everyone tells me it's not the same since Remington bought them and makes them in the old Ilion, New York factory. It's old, I know, I was there in 1999 when Remington had a sporting clays school in Ilion. Winchester may be good, but not in my experience. I looked for used lever actions for six months, but all I found in .357 looked like the stock was used as a hammer or baseball bat. Henry was left and now my thumbs are grateful. The fact that it's the only lever action (correct me if I'm wrong) that is 100% made in the USA was another plus. Also those Henry infomercials convinced me that Mr. Imperato would take care of me if the Henry needed warranty work. If Henry made both loading systems, I guess I would buy the side loader and lots of band-aids.
Last edited by red ryder on Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RanchRoper
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 12953
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:14 am
Location: Land of Shining Mountains, Alberta
Canada

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by RanchRoper » Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:22 pm

I'll likely be the slowest guy reloading at the range with my new 1860 but it's sure gonna be fun to shoot. :)

Pedersoli Frontier Flintlock .50
Kibler Colonial Flintlock .50

Ohkínohkomit - Shoot skillfully

tx gunrunner

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by tx gunrunner » Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:09 am

red ryder wrote: My first lever action in the early 90's was a Winchester 94 in .45 LC. It was sent back to Winchester three times b/c of failure to feed rounds.
The Winc 92 and 94 was designed for bottleneck cartridges like 44-40 and 30-30 . Straight wall cartridge like 45 Colt and 38/357 can be a problem in 92 and 94 Winc guns with a ramp to push bullets in chamber on a angle . The 45 Colt in a long action like 94 Winc is another problem .... Guns like a 1860 , 1866 and 1873 Winc or clone have a elevator to lift a straight wall cartridge up to it is in perfect alignment before pushing it in the chamber . I hope this help .

red ryder

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by red ryder » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:36 pm

tx gunrunner wrote:
red ryder wrote: My first lever action in the early 90's was a Winchester 94 in .45 LC. It was sent back to Winchester three times b/c of failure to feed rounds.
The Winc 92 and 94 was designed for bottleneck cartridges like 44-40 and 30-30 . Straight wall cartridge like 45 Colt and 38/357 can be a problem in 92 and 94 Winc guns with a ramp to push bullets in chamber on a angle . The 45 Colt in a long action like 94 Winc is another problem .... Guns like a 1860 , 1866 and 1873 Winc or clone have a elevator to lift a straight wall cartridge up to it is in perfect alignment before pushing it in the chamber . I hope this help .
I guess I forgot exactly which Winchester I had. It was a long time ago and I'm old and just sitting around waiting for the grim reaper to knock on my door and tell me it's time to go. :lol:

User avatar
RanchRoper
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 12953
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:14 am
Location: Land of Shining Mountains, Alberta
Canada

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by RanchRoper » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:54 pm

If you're waiting for him, he won't come. It's like Santa. :)

Pedersoli Frontier Flintlock .50
Kibler Colonial Flintlock .50

Ohkínohkomit - Shoot skillfully

SteveO1704

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by SteveO1704 » Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:54 pm

I went back and forth over side load or front load. Decided front load is ok because I want side eject more so I can install a peep/scope to compensate for my aging eyes.

User avatar
clovishound
Drover
Posts: 2513
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:18 pm
Location: Summerville SC
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by clovishound » Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:56 pm

I've tried side loading gates. Made me glad I have a front loader.
There is, I think, humor here which does not translate well from English to sanity. - Sanya

User avatar
RanchRoper
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 12953
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:14 am
Location: Land of Shining Mountains, Alberta
Canada

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by RanchRoper » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:17 am

...or maybe a rear load tube fed 1865 Spencer is best?

:)

Pedersoli Frontier Flintlock .50
Kibler Colonial Flintlock .50

Ohkínohkomit - Shoot skillfully

ditto1958
Cowboy
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:46 pm
Location: Northeastern Wisconsin
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by ditto1958 » Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:09 pm

clovishound wrote:I've tried side loading gates. Made me glad I have a front loader.
Loading handgun caliber cartridges through a gate is easy. Loading 30-30's is often not fun at all.

tx gunrunner

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by tx gunrunner » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:12 pm

clovishound wrote:I've tried side loading gates. Made me glad I have a front loader.
I did a lot of rabbit hunting and topping off loading tube after firing when walking can be a pain . I shot a lot of rats and sitting at the dump at night and a loading tube was no problem . I used a Marlin 39 and I bent a brass inside tube walking and loading when I hit a low tree branch .

Now riding a horse or motorcycle and hunting the side loading gate is a blessing after firing your gun to top it off and fast too . Like a 92 or 94 Winc . No inside loading tube fall out and lose or bend . If I shoot on bench I load gun thur the ejection port .

Post Reply