Site seems to be working OK.
Side Gate vs Tube Feed
Side Gate vs Tube Feed
Just thought I would air out a little frustration with other forums I visit. I dont see it here because were all Henry lovers. But does it get to you with the constant gripping about the lack of a side gate on a Henry. Im sure many of you own both as I do but I dont let the fact that my Henrys dont have a side gate on them judge whether there a legitimate levergun or not. After all the original was a tube feed. Get over it. Enjoy the gun it has a lever on it, works just like those official leverguns do with the side gates. Al
Last edited by BigAl52 on Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't let the old man in
H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55
H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55
- North Country Gal
- Firearms Advisor
- Posts: 6823
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:46 pm
- Location: northern Wisconsin

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
With you all the way. Both systems have been used on various lever guns since the beginning and I can see advantages for both. When a side gate is working nice and slick, it's great, but have had my share that were nasty finger pinchers, too. Those can be slow and awkward to load. For sure, my husband with his big hands sometimes struggles with them. He'd get along great with a top loader in a centerfire. He loves them in a 22 LR. No cuts in the side of the receiver not a bad idea either for better strength and rigidity., too. Easier to unload, too. Love the simplicity of them.
- JEBar
- Town Marshal / Deputy Admin
- Posts: 20413
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
- Location: central NC

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
we own lever action that are tube fed, side gate fed, and clip fed .... the all have advantages, they all have disadvantages .... I like and use them all .... the one thing I wish Henry had is a button or slide safety .... not having one has never been a problem with our Winchester, BLR or Henry levers but I like the thought of being able to put the safety on without having to pull the trigger in the process ...
- North Country Gal
- Firearms Advisor
- Posts: 6823
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:46 pm
- Location: northern Wisconsin

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
Yeah, a lot of Marlin folks slam the button safety on later vintage Marlins, but some folks do like them when unloading their guns as they work the action to shuck ammo. With the safety on, no worries about an AD as they work the action. Never been an issue for me, one way or the other. For sure, that button safety has never stopped me from buying a Marlin when I found one I otherwise liked.
-
Squatch
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
I think for me the biggest gripe is the myth that you have to put your hand in front of the muzzle to tube load a Henry.
Just plain incorrect. I never have my hand in front. Just use the thumb and index finger with the palm over the tube not the muzzle.
The whole loading gate thing is a non issue for me. I like the tube fed.
Just plain incorrect. I never have my hand in front. Just use the thumb and index finger with the palm over the tube not the muzzle.
The whole loading gate thing is a non issue for me. I like the tube fed.
-
Les
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
It's not an issue for me either. I've had gate loaders and tube feeds. It doesn't matter to me how the rounds go in - it's how they come out the business end that puts a smile on my face.
As has been said, there are pro's and con's for both systems. I've had Rossi's and Marlin's, and enjoyed them both, but now I've experienced a Henry, I wouldn't swap it for anything.
As has been said, there are pro's and con's for both systems. I've had Rossi's and Marlin's, and enjoyed them both, but now I've experienced a Henry, I wouldn't swap it for anything.
-
bandit1250
- Cowboy
- Posts: 1692
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:25 pm

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
It is no secret that I am a Marlin lever fan. I hear the Marlin guys and fans of other brands of lever rifles cut up the Henry for tube loading on their center fires. I honestly believe their problem is seeing all that brass showing through the loading port on especially the bigger cartridge rifles. If the tube was blued they probably wouldn't pay as much attention to it. The Marlin guys tend to for get that one of the rifles they all would love to have from the Marlin line up is the 32 H&R magnum. Guess what? Tube loaded! Another thing with gate load other than pinching fingers loading it is if the loading gate screw gets loose undetected they tend to jam when cycling. Easy fix unless you are in the woods with no tools. The Henry would be much better to unload after your hunt by pulling out the tube and dumping the loaded rounds out and put the tube back in and cycle the round from the chamber and give it a few more cycles to make sure none hung up in the tube and your done. I can unload my 444 Marlin by using a loaded round and pushing in the loading gate and it works most of the time but other calibers not so much. I guess I am not a "Marlin snob" and like the Henry's just fine.
- RanchRoper
- Forum Ambassador
- Posts: 12953
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:14 am
- Location: Land of Shining Mountains, Alberta

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
The tube reload isn't an issue for me, and if 10 rounds won't solve the problem, I'm in serious trouble.
Pedersoli Frontier Flintlock .50
Kibler Colonial Flintlock .50
Ohkínohkomit - Shoot skillfully
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
I have never owned a Winchester or a Marlin lever rifle but did have a Braztech .357 with the loading gate. I normally used a round to feed the other rounds into the tube so I didn't get bit. I sold it after I got my BBS .357 and have not regretted it. I prefer the Henry loading tube.
H001, H001L, H004, H001TM, H001TLB, H006, H010, H012M, H012GR
NRA Member, GOA Member, ISRA Member, ILCCW
NRA Member, GOA Member, ISRA Member, ILCCW
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
I prefer the lack of a loading gate. One less thing to worry about. I have had a malfunction with a Marlin at a range that totally shut the gun down. As I was loading it, one of the rounds came out of the tube and lodged behind the loading gate. Easy fix with a Henry by just dumping all of the rounds out of the tube. With the Marlin, I either had to take the cap off the end of the tube or try to somehow open the action far enough to remove the lever and the bolt. I was able to do the latter, but it took a bit of force. There might have been other ways to clear it easier, but none that I or others at the range could figure out.
I don't own any Marlins anymore and any lever gun I buy in the future will be a Henry. I like their simplicity and reliability. Besides, their customer service is also the best. I was having a conversation with a friend at work about companies moving their factories or offices overseas (as ours has done). I compared them to Henry Repeating Arms and gave examples of how their prices are the best (I saw Marlins priced at $200 more recently) yet their quality is probably the best, and their customer service is without a doubt the best. I guess you can call me a Henry snob even if I only own one at the moment
I don't own any Marlins anymore and any lever gun I buy in the future will be a Henry. I like their simplicity and reliability. Besides, their customer service is also the best. I was having a conversation with a friend at work about companies moving their factories or offices overseas (as ours has done). I compared them to Henry Repeating Arms and gave examples of how their prices are the best (I saw Marlins priced at $200 more recently) yet their quality is probably the best, and their customer service is without a doubt the best. I guess you can call me a Henry snob even if I only own one at the moment
Made by Henry, Or Not Made At All
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
The loading gate dead horse rises again!
- Sir Henry
- Administrator / Owner
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
- Location: Price County Wisconsin

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
I prefer a loading gate because that is the way Lucas McCain loaded his Winchester in the opening sequence.
One advantage no one has mentioned is with a gate you can top off with a round if you shot a round.
One advantage no one has mentioned is with a gate you can top off with a round if you shot a round.
Hi, my name is Gene and I'm a Henryholic from Wisconsin.
Range Reporter: Henry Repeater
Range Reporter: Henry Repeater
- JEBar
- Town Marshal / Deputy Admin
- Posts: 20413
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
- Location: central NC

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
true but I can do that by dropping one in the loading tubeSir Henry wrote:One advantage no one has mentioned is with a gate you can top off with a round if you shot a round.
- clovishound
- Drover
- Posts: 2513
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:18 pm
- Location: Summerville SC

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
I have had limited experience with gates. I did have the opportunity to load my buddy's Marlin in 44 mag. I really didn't like loading it. I can't imagine having to load 10 rounds at a time that way. My Big Boy gets most of it's work at the range. That is where the loading tube shines IMO. Even when hunting, if I have to shoot 10 rounds and then quickly reload a couple rounds, something is seriously, seriously wrong. At that point, I will drop my Henry and pull my sidearm loaded with 17 rounds, and another spare 17 round mag readily available. I see people carrying lots of bolt action rifles while hunting that have a 5 round box mag. I doubt many of them carry 4 or 5 spare mags, ready to reload. Some probably have one extra mag on them. Many will have some extra rounds, just in case, but only one mag.
There is, I think, humor here which does not translate well from English to sanity. - Sanya
- North Country Gal
- Firearms Advisor
- Posts: 6823
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:46 pm
- Location: northern Wisconsin

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
Good points, Clovis. Out in the woods for hunting or even for protection against toothy critters, both versions carry more than you need. I typically carry a single action revolver as a woods carry gun and don't feel the gun lacks capacity.
- Cowboy Gun Fan
- Cowboy
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:42 am
- Location: SW Virginia

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
Well, I wasn't going to say anything, but yes, I prefer a Loading Gate, but I would not let that stop me from buying a Henry.
I already have one, lol.
I already have one, lol.
NRA Member
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
I think true blue Marlin owners can't admit that Henry rifles are superior to Marlin so they bring up the loading gate issue which in their eyes makes Marlins far superior. Sure, if we still had marauding Indians about and was constantly having a good ole western shootout every other week then yes, I would have a loading gate on my levers. But thankfully those days are long gone and the NEED for a loading gate has went the same way. I own both and like them both but I did notice that when my family goes to the range for a day of .44 mag fun by the end of the session everyone is only shooting the Henry's due to sore thumbs from the loading gates.
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
I own both and have no problem with tube loading.
-
tx gunrunner
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
I prefer and manual transmission in all my cars and trucks . I hate automatic transmission . I like side loading gate over loading the tube feed . I can name 10 thing why the tube loads suck and the same thing with the side gate loading .

-
Henry88
Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed
X2 I think the folks at the Marlin forum fancy themselves as Steve McQueen, reloading in the heat of battle, rather than some pre-puberty adolescent loading his Glenfield model 60.Sir Henry wrote:I prefer a loading gate because that is the way Lucas McCain loaded his Winchester in the opening sequence.