The site should be fixed. We show secure now, we should have a favicon and the picture aspect should be better.

Companion piece for a non-Henry rifle

User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 2987
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

Re: Companion piece for a non-Henry rifle

Post by GunnyGene » Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:57 am

fortyshooter wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:49 am
45 ACP six shooter?
I actually considered that, but wanted a gun that took the same Glock mags as my Ruger LC Carbine.
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

rickhem
Cattle Driver
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2022 7:44 am
Location: Schoharie County, NY
United States of America

Re: Companion piece for a non-Henry rifle

Post by rickhem » Sun Dec 29, 2024 12:11 pm

GunnyGene wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:38 am
rickhem wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:46 am
I can remember guys talking about "tuning" the ejector on the Glocks. This turned into a comparison of tuning a 1911 ejector, like was done when everyone started shooting dot sights on their Bullseye pistols. But the buddies I had that shot the Glock matches all said there was a way to keep the brass from flying back at you, and it had to do with some small modifications to the ejector, or replacing it with a different generation ejector, or a different recoil spring, or maybe some combination of these. I'll say right now that I know next to nothing about Glocks, but I do remember those conversations, and how some guys got their Glocks ejecting to the side like other pistols did. I'm sure you're not the only one ever wanting to do this.
Yes, I've also read several posts on other forums about tweaking various parts to "fix" what appears to be a somewhat common problem. But I didn't buy this gun for it to be 'project gun'. This is an issue for Glock to remedy, not something for me to diddle around with. Btw, the Glock Warranty stinks. They might as well not even have one at all.

https://us.glock.com/en/OWN/Warranty
I completely understand, and I get where you're coming from.
As a brand new, fresh out of the box from the LGS, direct from the manufacturer firearm, they can get the first chance to fix it. But very often you'll hear "it meets all specifications" when you get it back. You aren't doing anything special with it, and not using it for any kind of specific discipline which would benefit from modifications, you just don't want to get beaned every time it ejects. I've shot pistols that did that, and it's distracting as hell.
I hope they can take care of it for you Gene.

User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 2987
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

Re: Companion piece for a non-Henry rifle

Post by GunnyGene » Sun Dec 29, 2024 12:24 pm

rickhem wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 12:11 pm
GunnyGene wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:38 am
rickhem wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:46 am
I can remember guys talking about "tuning" the ejector on the Glocks. This turned into a comparison of tuning a 1911 ejector, like was done when everyone started shooting dot sights on their Bullseye pistols. But the buddies I had that shot the Glock matches all said there was a way to keep the brass from flying back at you, and it had to do with some small modifications to the ejector, or replacing it with a different generation ejector, or a different recoil spring, or maybe some combination of these. I'll say right now that I know next to nothing about Glocks, but I do remember those conversations, and how some guys got their Glocks ejecting to the side like other pistols did. I'm sure you're not the only one ever wanting to do this.
Yes, I've also read several posts on other forums about tweaking various parts to "fix" what appears to be a somewhat common problem. But I didn't buy this gun for it to be 'project gun'. This is an issue for Glock to remedy, not something for me to diddle around with. Btw, the Glock Warranty stinks. They might as well not even have one at all.

https://us.glock.com/en/OWN/Warranty
I completely understand, and I get where you're coming from.
As a brand new, fresh out of the box from the LGS, direct from the manufacturer firearm, they can get the first chance to fix it. But very often you'll hear "it meets all specifications" when you get it back. You aren't doing anything special with it, and not using it for any kind of specific discipline which would benefit from modifications, you just don't want to get beaned every time it ejects. I've shot pistols that did that, and it's distracting as hell.
I hope they can take care of it for you Gene.
I hope they do also, but I'm not counting on it. I'll take part of the blame for this experience since I didn't do my usual in depth pre-purchase homework. All I'd ever heard was how great Glocks were; "Glock Perfection" and all that other marketing crap that I should have ignored.
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

User avatar
Ernie
Drover
Posts: 2325
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2019 8:07 pm
Location: Southwestern Lower Michigan
United States of America

Re: Companion piece for a non-Henry rifle

Post by Ernie » Sun Dec 29, 2024 12:43 pm

I am not impressed with the warranty. You are correct, it is pretty much nonexistent.

Travlin
Cowboy
Posts: 1501
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 1:06 am

Re: Companion piece for a non-Henry rifle

Post by Travlin » Mon Dec 30, 2024 10:52 pm

I keep my Glock with a round in the chamber even when it's put away and I was worried that the spring that fires it would become weak. I called Glock and they put me through one of the tech guys and he told me " nothing to worry about" so I don't and it always goes bang when I need it to.

User avatar
Mags
Ranch Foreman
Posts: 8219
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:40 pm
Location: Tualatin Valley Oregon
United States of America

Re: Companion piece for a non-Henry rifle

Post by Mags » Tue Dec 31, 2024 12:35 am

I once bought a Glock 42. I wasn't impressed. It's the only firearm I got rid of.
UPDATES: OR passes 114, "one of strictest gun control measures in U.S." https://henryrifleforums.com/viewtopic. ... 34#p213234

User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 2987
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

Re: Companion piece for a non-Henry rifle

Post by GunnyGene » Tue Dec 31, 2024 6:51 am

rickhem wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 12:11 pm
GunnyGene wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:38 am
rickhem wrote:
Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:46 am
I can remember guys talking about "tuning" the ejector on the Glocks. This turned into a comparison of tuning a 1911 ejector, like was done when everyone started shooting dot sights on their Bullseye pistols. But the buddies I had that shot the Glock matches all said there was a way to keep the brass from flying back at you, and it had to do with some small modifications to the ejector, or replacing it with a different generation ejector, or a different recoil spring, or maybe some combination of these. I'll say right now that I know next to nothing about Glocks, but I do remember those conversations, and how some guys got their Glocks ejecting to the side like other pistols did. I'm sure you're not the only one ever wanting to do this.
Yes, I've also read several posts on other forums about tweaking various parts to "fix" what appears to be a somewhat common problem. But I didn't buy this gun for it to be 'project gun'. This is an issue for Glock to remedy, not something for me to diddle around with. Btw, the Glock Warranty stinks. They might as well not even have one at all.

https://us.glock.com/en/OWN/Warranty
I completely understand, and I get where you're coming from.
As a brand new, fresh out of the box from the LGS, direct from the manufacturer firearm, they can get the first chance to fix it. But very often you'll hear "it meets all specifications" when you get it back. You aren't doing anything special with it, and not using it for any kind of specific discipline which would benefit from modifications, you just don't want to get beaned every time it ejects. I've shot pistols that did that, and it's distracting as hell.
I hope they can take care of it for you Gene.
Still haven't gotten a reply from Glock, but I did find a video about how to fix the BTF issue. Looked reasonable and not difficult, so I'll be doing what he recommends, except for the ejector. The G21 gen 5 ejector is a completely different design, so can't take a file to it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl5P0Pfz1s8
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

Post Reply