Spring has sprung. Get out and shoot your Henry

Side Gate vs Tube Feed

here is a place to discuss anything related to Henry
Post Reply
User avatar
red ryder
Tenderfoot
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 5:14 pm
Location: Wyoming
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by red ryder » Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:17 pm

I just bought my Henry BB .357 after going over the side gate vs. the loading tube issue. My first lever action in the early 90's was a Winchester 94 in .45 LC. It was sent back to Winchester three times b/c of failure to feed rounds. Finally Winchester sent me a check for the purchase price. I added money and bought an Uberti in .45 LC with a 24-1/4" barrel. I soon realized the barrel was too long and so I sold that and bought a Marlin in .45 LC with a color case hardened receiver. Each of these lever actions took skin off my thumb no matter how careful I was. My source to reload .45 LC decided b/c of legal liability to discontinue reloading my saved brass. I sold my beautiful Marlin. Years later I got the itch for another lever action rifle after watching an infomercial with Anthony Imperato, but this time in .357. For over six months I looked for another side loader. Well Marlin doesn't make .357 any more and everyone tells me it's not the same since Remington bought them and makes them in the old Ilion, New York factory. It's old, I know, I was there in 1999 when Remington had a sporting clays school in Ilion. Winchester may be good, but not in my experience. I looked for used lever actions for six months, but all I found in .357 looked like the stock was used as a hammer or baseball bat. Henry was left and now my thumbs are grateful. The fact that it's the only lever action (correct me if I'm wrong) that is 100% made in the USA was another plus. Also those Henry infomercials convinced me that Mr. Imperato would take care of me if the Henry needed warranty work. If Henry made both loading systems, I guess I would buy the side loader and lots of band-aids.
Last edited by red ryder on Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 x
NRA Endowment Life Member
Henry Big Boy .357
and some other firearms

User avatar
RanchRoper
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 12692
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:14 am
Location: Land of Shining Mountains, Alberta
Canada

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by RanchRoper » Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:22 pm

I'll likely be the slowest guy reloading at the range with my new 1860 but it's sure gonna be fun to shoot. :)
2 x
1860 Colt SA Richards Conversion Revolver .45C
1860 Henry .45C
1885 High Wall .45C
1820-1840 Frontier Percussion .50
1790-1820 Frontier Flintlock .50

Ohkínohkomit - Shoot skillfully

User avatar
tx gunrunner
Firearms Advisor
Posts: 888
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: near Ft Hood Tx
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by tx gunrunner » Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:09 am

red ryder wrote: My first lever action in the early 90's was a Winchester 94 in .45 LC. It was sent back to Winchester three times b/c of failure to feed rounds.
The Winc 92 and 94 was designed for bottleneck cartridges like 44-40 and 30-30 . Straight wall cartridge like 45 Colt and 38/357 can be a problem in 92 and 94 Winc guns with a ramp to push bullets in chamber on a angle . The 45 Colt in a long action like 94 Winc is another problem .... Guns like a 1860 , 1866 and 1873 Winc or clone have a elevator to lift a straight wall cartridge up to it is in perfect alignment before pushing it in the chamber . I hope this help .
3 x

User avatar
red ryder
Tenderfoot
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 5:14 pm
Location: Wyoming
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by red ryder » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:36 pm

tx gunrunner wrote:
red ryder wrote: My first lever action in the early 90's was a Winchester 94 in .45 LC. It was sent back to Winchester three times b/c of failure to feed rounds.
The Winc 92 and 94 was designed for bottleneck cartridges like 44-40 and 30-30 . Straight wall cartridge like 45 Colt and 38/357 can be a problem in 92 and 94 Winc guns with a ramp to push bullets in chamber on a angle . The 45 Colt in a long action like 94 Winc is another problem .... Guns like a 1860 , 1866 and 1873 Winc or clone have a elevator to lift a straight wall cartridge up to it is in perfect alignment before pushing it in the chamber . I hope this help .
I guess I forgot exactly which Winchester I had. It was a long time ago and I'm old and just sitting around waiting for the grim reaper to knock on my door and tell me it's time to go. :lol:
0 x
NRA Endowment Life Member
Henry Big Boy .357
and some other firearms

User avatar
RanchRoper
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 12692
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:14 am
Location: Land of Shining Mountains, Alberta
Canada

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by RanchRoper » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:54 pm

If you're waiting for him, he won't come. It's like Santa. :)
1 x
1860 Colt SA Richards Conversion Revolver .45C
1860 Henry .45C
1885 High Wall .45C
1820-1840 Frontier Percussion .50
1790-1820 Frontier Flintlock .50

Ohkínohkomit - Shoot skillfully

SteveO1704
Tenderfoot
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:15 pm
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by SteveO1704 » Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:54 pm

I went back and forth over side load or front load. Decided front load is ok because I want side eject more so I can install a peep/scope to compensate for my aging eyes.
1 x

User avatar
clovishound
Drover
Posts: 2086
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 4:18 pm
Location: Summerville SC
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by clovishound » Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:56 pm

I've tried side loading gates. Made me glad I have a front loader.
3 x
There is, I think, humor here which does not translate well from English to sanity. - Sanya

User avatar
RanchRoper
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 12692
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:14 am
Location: Land of Shining Mountains, Alberta
Canada

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by RanchRoper » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:17 am

...or maybe a rear load tube fed 1865 Spencer is best?

:)
1 x
1860 Colt SA Richards Conversion Revolver .45C
1860 Henry .45C
1885 High Wall .45C
1820-1840 Frontier Percussion .50
1790-1820 Frontier Flintlock .50

Ohkínohkomit - Shoot skillfully

ditto1958
Cowboy
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:46 pm
Location: Northeastern Wisconsin
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by ditto1958 » Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:09 pm

clovishound wrote:I've tried side loading gates. Made me glad I have a front loader.
Loading handgun caliber cartridges through a gate is easy. Loading 30-30's is often not fun at all.
1 x

User avatar
tx gunrunner
Firearms Advisor
Posts: 888
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: near Ft Hood Tx
United States of America

Re: Side Gate vs Tube Feed

Post by tx gunrunner » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:12 pm

clovishound wrote:I've tried side loading gates. Made me glad I have a front loader.
I did a lot of rabbit hunting and topping off loading tube after firing when walking can be a pain . I shot a lot of rats and sitting at the dump at night and a loading tube was no problem . I used a Marlin 39 and I bent a brass inside tube walking and loading when I hit a low tree branch .

Now riding a horse or motorcycle and hunting the side loading gate is a blessing after firing your gun to top it off and fast too . Like a 92 or 94 Winc . No inside loading tube fall out and lose or bend . If I shoot on bench I load gun thur the ejection port .
0 x

Post Reply