minimalist base(s)/rings please help
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:37 pm
OK, I admit, the true minimalist would be iron sights. However, I am putting a scope on my new H009g and am starting to confuse myself. The scope has a 30mm tube and I got matched weaver style rings and the weaver 63b bases (and whatever come in the Henry Box). I don't really like the bolts that tighten the rings to the base. I have been looking at Skinner, but they still require the rings be added and at Warne, if you get the kind with no bolt near the bottom, you get an addition connection at the top. I am not interested in QD style connections
I would really like a base that has the bottom 1/2 of the ring integrated into it. Any tips on this, or mounting in general, or the least obtrusive way to connect everything? Attached is a pic of my Rem 700 set up which is kind of what I am aiming for; though if I am being objective this might not be any less obtrusive, but is just what I am used to looking at! Oh, any rings with see though bottoms (or do you know what the clearance has to be) if I want to be able to see the buckhorn sights at a glance w/o the Skinner? Anything else I should be considering?
Thanks in advance!
I would really like a base that has the bottom 1/2 of the ring integrated into it. Any tips on this, or mounting in general, or the least obtrusive way to connect everything? Attached is a pic of my Rem 700 set up which is kind of what I am aiming for; though if I am being objective this might not be any less obtrusive, but is just what I am used to looking at! Oh, any rings with see though bottoms (or do you know what the clearance has to be) if I want to be able to see the buckhorn sights at a glance w/o the Skinner? Anything else I should be considering?
Thanks in advance!