Site seems to be OK. Load issue should be resolved now.

Naval gun propellants

Sit back and talk with friends. Same rules as before. Rule #1-Relax with friends on the front or back porch.
Rule #2-No Politics, religion or anything above a G level.
Post Reply
User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 3005
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

Naval gun propellants

Post by GunnyGene » Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:05 am

Question came up on another forum asking about what propellants were used in large bore naval artillery (Cruisers, Battleships, etc.) during WWII. Many people think it was black powder, which is essentially a myth. Smokeless powders started being used around 1908, and included cordite, nitrocellulose, and others that were developed by different countries, and for different guns. Here's some detailed information about this that I thought would be of interest.

For example D839 was one of the US propellants. It's a smokeless powder.

"The propellant was in six bags for both full and reduced charges. Primer patch was at one end, quilted to ensure even distribution, and usually colored red. The other end had a handling strap. Bags were transferred from hoist to loading tray three bags at a time and then all six bags were rammed into the breech with a single stroke. During the 1980s reactivations, some experiments were performed using five bag loads. The D839 propellant grain used for full charges issued for this gun was 2 inches long (5.08 cm), 1 inch in diameter (2.54 cm) and had seven perforations, each 0.060 inches in diameter (0.152 cm) with a web thickness range of 0.193 to 0.197 inches (0.490 to 0.500 cm) between the perforations and the grain diameter. Propellant bags were made from raw silk, although rayon was introduced during the 1980 activations."

More about the various powders used and other info here:

http://www.warships.com.cn/navweaps/WNUS_16-50_mk7.htm

and here: http://navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-100.php
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

User avatar
Sir Henry
Administrator / Owner
Posts: 14677
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
Location: Price County Wisconsin
United States of America

Re: Naval gun propellants

Post by Sir Henry » Sun Oct 25, 2020 12:14 am

We had charge 7 whitebag and charge 5 greenbag on 155 mm howitzers. You could take one or multiple bags out. A charge 7 would become a charge 6 with one removed or a charge 5 with two removed. A charge 5 whitebag was not the same as a charge 5 greenbag.

It was definitely not black powder. It did smoke a little but nothing like BP.
Hi, my name is Gene and I'm a Henryholic from Wisconsin.

Range Reporter: Henry Repeater

User avatar
Headhog
Cowboy
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 2:51 pm
Location: Central Virginia
United States of America

Re: Naval gun propellants

Post by Headhog » Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:21 pm

Back about 1983-84 one senior member of our gun club, whom I had never met, was selling a High Standard target pistol in our club news letter. He was asking a fair price so I decided to buy it. I went to his house to meet him and purchased the gun, Ed was in his 80's and in poor health, but we sat and talked for awhile. 4 hours later we ended our talk. I was totally fascinated by his military tails from WW-I and WW-II. Just as I was leaving Ed handed me a cardboard box of cartridges and miscellaneous primers he had collected.

The box contained many old antique cartridges including some rim fire rounds (not .22). It also had several, what I believe were mine primers/fuses. In the bottom of the box I found a dozen hollow sticks about 1 1/2" long and 1/2' in diameter. I had no idea what these were, but I put them to the side and kept them. Several years later I found out these were sticks of smokeless powder used in some large artillery shell. Sure enough there was was one broken stick and it ignited and burned just like any smokeless powder outside of a shell/chamber. This was a real learning experience, since I had no idea what the propellant for artillery rounds looked like.

Paul

User avatar
Rifletom
Deputy Marshal
Posts: 4013
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:26 pm
Location: California Territory
United States of America

Re: Naval gun propellants

Post by Rifletom » Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:02 pm

Interesting post and links. Thanks Gunny. My Dad would liked to have seen this.

User avatar
GunnyGene
Drover
Posts: 3005
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:15 am
Location: Monroe County, MS
United States of America

Re: Naval gun propellants

Post by GunnyGene » Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:29 pm

Rifletom wrote:
Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:02 pm
Interesting post and links. Thanks Gunny. My Dad would liked to have seen this.
Thanks, and your welcome. We've come a long ways since that Chinese guy discovered the magic powder. ;) :mrgreen:
Bellum Omnium Contra Omnes is rapidly becoming a reality (11/2023). Para Bellum.

User avatar
Sir Henry
Administrator / Owner
Posts: 14677
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
Location: Price County Wisconsin
United States of America

Re: Naval gun propellants

Post by Sir Henry » Thu Oct 29, 2020 4:38 pm

I asked a couple of my unit buddies and they said the charges did have some black power in the base of each charge sewn into the cotton cloth bag. This was for 155 mm Howitzers. The powder was thrown into the tube after the round was rammed. The breach was closed and the the primer which was about the size of a .410 was inserted into the breach. It was fired with the pull of a lanyard.
Hi, my name is Gene and I'm a Henryholic from Wisconsin.

Range Reporter: Henry Repeater

Post Reply