Site seems to be working OK.

Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post Reply
User avatar
If1Hitu
Cattle Driver
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:23 pm
Location: Derby City,KY.
United States of America

Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by If1Hitu » Thu Oct 03, 2019 11:09 am

Anyone here own a Browning Buck Mark .22 pistol? How dose it measure up to Ruger Mark I II III IV & S&W Victory pistols?
A individual can't be a Army
A individual can't be a Navy.
A individual can't be a Air Force
A individual can't be a Coast Guard
A individual can be a MARINE! Semper Fi.

User avatar
GaHenryFan
Cowhand
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:02 am
Location: Middle Georgia
United States of America

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by GaHenryFan » Thu Oct 03, 2019 11:13 am

20190916204809889506eaac61ef8c-01.jpeg
I love mine, but it's not exactly stock. It was plenty accurate and reliable right out of the box though.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Mistered

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by Mistered » Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:02 pm

I had an early Gen 1 Buckmark with the slab sided barrel.
Shot well, no feeding problems and VERY accurate with a good trigger if I remember correctly.
I did not like how the barrel was secured with just one cap screw. It kept coming loose. I probably could have resolved this with some Locktite but never got 'around to it'.
Ultimately it began to feel 'cheap' to me (remember to ME) due to it's relatively light frame weight and heavy barrel but it was very well built.
Ultimately lost interest and sold.
How dose it measure up to Ruger Mark I II III IV & S&W Victory pistols?
I wouldn't put S & W 'Victory' pistols in the same category as either the Ruger or the Browning however from handling an shooting Ruger 'Marks' (not owning) I believe the Rugers are vastly superior to the Browning, especially the Mark II & 1V models.

Personally I despise S & W for using the historical name of a classic WW II era pistol on a modern polymer .22. Pure sacrilege!
Last edited by Mistered on Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

tractortad

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by tractortad » Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:29 pm

I would say that the Browning Buckmark measures up very well to a Ruger Mk4. We have a Ruger Mk4 Hunter and a Browning Buckmark Plus Rosewood UDX - both are well made, fun little 22LR pistols, but the Browning is our favorite between the two - mostly because it is lighter and feels better in the hand than the Ruger - making it easier to shoot.

tractortad

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by tractortad » Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:36 pm

Mistered wrote:
Thu Oct 03, 2019 1:02 pm
Personally I despise S & W for using the historical name of a classic WW II era pistol on a modern polymer .22. Pure sacrilege!
I thought S&w Victories have SS slides, frames, and barrels. Where is the polymer?

Mistered

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by Mistered » Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:43 pm

Where is the polymer?
I stand corrected.
I had the S & W Victory .22 confused with another brand of .22 pistol that DOES have a polymer frame.

Update - I had no practical understanding of the S & W Victory .22 so I did a little research and am very impressed!
I place this gun in the category of the Ruger Mark III & IV.

User avatar
BigAl52
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 15048
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:43 pm
Location: Evans,Colorado
United States of America

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by BigAl52 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:51 pm

I gotta say I like the Ruger 22/44 ultra lite better than the standard Mark pistols. I liked the Buckmarks I owned but there screws will strip out easy if not careful.
Don't let the old man in


H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55

User avatar
If1Hitu
Cattle Driver
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:23 pm
Location: Derby City,KY.
United States of America

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by If1Hitu » Fri Oct 25, 2019 7:41 pm

That is sweet looker GaHenryFan.
A individual can't be a Army
A individual can't be a Navy.
A individual can't be a Air Force
A individual can't be a Coast Guard
A individual can be a MARINE! Semper Fi.

User avatar
dave77
Drover
Posts: 2310
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:09 am
Location: Eastern Washington
United States of America

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by dave77 » Fri Oct 25, 2019 9:06 pm

Have never shot a Buckmark or a Ruger Mark but I have a Browning Challenger II. Is probably a lot more accurate than my level of proficiency.

Image

User avatar
BigAl52
Forum Ambassador
Posts: 15048
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:43 pm
Location: Evans,Colorado
United States of America

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by BigAl52 » Fri Oct 25, 2019 10:57 pm

Isnt that the case Dave with most of us when it comes to pistol shooting. Except for NCG and RR of course
Don't let the old man in


H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55

User avatar
dave77
Drover
Posts: 2310
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:09 am
Location: Eastern Washington
United States of America

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22

Post by dave77 » Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:52 am

BigAl52 wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 10:57 pm
Isnt that the case Dave with most of us when it comes to pistol shooting. Except for NCG and RR of course
I think when it comes to off-hand I'm actually better with a handgun than a rifle. First target is with my favorite handgun, my Beretta PX4 Compact 9mm, 7 yards, semi-rapid fire, 15 shots. As you can see by the hole near the top, my first shot which is DA needs some work.

2nd target is my .357 BBB at 30 yds but it's resting on the hood of my truck, I'm not nearly as accurate offhand which is the 3rd target.
targets are standard size copy paper

Image

Image

Image

Post Reply