Site seems to be working OK.
Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
Anyone here own a Browning Buck Mark .22 pistol? How dose it measure up to Ruger Mark I II III IV & S&W Victory pistols?
A individual can't be a Army
A individual can't be a Navy.
A individual can't be a Air Force
A individual can't be a Coast Guard
A individual can be a MARINE! Semper Fi.
A individual can't be a Navy.
A individual can't be a Air Force
A individual can't be a Coast Guard
A individual can be a MARINE! Semper Fi.
- GaHenryFan
- Cowhand
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:02 am
- Location: Middle Georgia

Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
I love mine, but it's not exactly stock. It was plenty accurate and reliable right out of the box though.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Mistered
Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
I had an early Gen 1 Buckmark with the slab sided barrel.
Shot well, no feeding problems and VERY accurate with a good trigger if I remember correctly.
I did not like how the barrel was secured with just one cap screw. It kept coming loose. I probably could have resolved this with some Locktite but never got 'around to it'.
Ultimately it began to feel 'cheap' to me (remember to ME) due to it's relatively light frame weight and heavy barrel but it was very well built.
Ultimately lost interest and sold.
Personally I despise S & W for using the historical name of a classic WW II era pistol on a modern polymer .22. Pure sacrilege!
Shot well, no feeding problems and VERY accurate with a good trigger if I remember correctly.
I did not like how the barrel was secured with just one cap screw. It kept coming loose. I probably could have resolved this with some Locktite but never got 'around to it'.
Ultimately it began to feel 'cheap' to me (remember to ME) due to it's relatively light frame weight and heavy barrel but it was very well built.
Ultimately lost interest and sold.
I wouldn't put S & W 'Victory' pistols in the same category as either the Ruger or the Browning however from handling an shooting Ruger 'Marks' (not owning) I believe the Rugers are vastly superior to the Browning, especially the Mark II & 1V models.How dose it measure up to Ruger Mark I II III IV & S&W Victory pistols?
Personally I despise S & W for using the historical name of a classic WW II era pistol on a modern polymer .22. Pure sacrilege!
Last edited by Mistered on Thu Oct 03, 2019 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
tractortad
Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
I would say that the Browning Buckmark measures up very well to a Ruger Mk4. We have a Ruger Mk4 Hunter and a Browning Buckmark Plus Rosewood UDX - both are well made, fun little 22LR pistols, but the Browning is our favorite between the two - mostly because it is lighter and feels better in the hand than the Ruger - making it easier to shoot.
-
tractortad
-
Mistered
Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
I stand corrected.Where is the polymer?
I had the S & W Victory .22 confused with another brand of .22 pistol that DOES have a polymer frame.
Update - I had no practical understanding of the S & W Victory .22 so I did a little research and am very impressed!
I place this gun in the category of the Ruger Mark III & IV.
Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
I gotta say I like the Ruger 22/44 ultra lite better than the standard Mark pistols. I liked the Buckmarks I owned but there screws will strip out easy if not careful.
Don't let the old man in
H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55
H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55
Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
That is sweet looker GaHenryFan.
A individual can't be a Army
A individual can't be a Navy.
A individual can't be a Air Force
A individual can't be a Coast Guard
A individual can be a MARINE! Semper Fi.
A individual can't be a Navy.
A individual can't be a Air Force
A individual can't be a Coast Guard
A individual can be a MARINE! Semper Fi.
Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
Have never shot a Buckmark or a Ruger Mark but I have a Browning Challenger II. Is probably a lot more accurate than my level of proficiency.


Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
Isnt that the case Dave with most of us when it comes to pistol shooting. Except for NCG and RR of course
Don't let the old man in
H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55
H001T .22LR
H001T .22LR MONUMENT VALLEY
H003T PUMP .22LR
BBS .41 MAG
SS .357
SIDE GATE 38-55
Re: Opinions on Browning Buck Mark .22
I think when it comes to off-hand I'm actually better with a handgun than a rifle. First target is with my favorite handgun, my Beretta PX4 Compact 9mm, 7 yards, semi-rapid fire, 15 shots. As you can see by the hole near the top, my first shot which is DA needs some work.
2nd target is my .357 BBB at 30 yds but it's resting on the hood of my truck, I'm not nearly as accurate offhand which is the 3rd target.
targets are standard size copy paper


