Spring has sprung. Get out and shoot your Henry

equivalence of powders ?

All things reloading here
User avatar
BruniX
Cowhand
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:53 am
Location: Chevrolière , near Nantes
Contact:
France

equivalence of powders ?

Post by BruniX » Thu Dec 27, 2018 3:07 pm

hello !

hello to all, I came across this site that provides powder equivalence.

http://www.adi-powders.com.au/powder-equivalents/

What do you think about this ?

is this reliable and can we consider safely substituting one powder for another?
0 x
"Those who forget the past are condemned to relive it"
W. Churchill


Shadow 2 SA - CZ
P08 - Luger
AR-15 - SDI
586 - S&W
97 - CZ
T3 Tac. - Tikka
1895 SBL - Marlin
1860 COLT - Pietta

User avatar
JEBar
Town Marshal / Deputy Admin
Posts: 19337
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
Location: central NC
United States of America

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by JEBar » Thu Dec 27, 2018 3:12 pm

most reloading manuals have similar charts .... for me they provide interesting reading but I wouldn't use it as a single source for making a decision .... I prefer to go with the manual's specific recommendation as to the brand of powder and size of the powder charge
1 x

User avatar
Mistered
Drover
Posts: 3372
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:32 pm
Location: Wickiup Junction, OR
United States of America

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by Mistered » Thu Dec 27, 2018 3:15 pm

is this reliable and can we consider safely substituting one powder for another?
Not in the formal sense of 'substitution' as you DO NOT want use the load data for say powder "X" for powders 'Y' and 'Z' just because they are in the same category as equivalent.
What is meant by 'equivalent' is they are of a similar burning speed and will produce similar velocities and energy in loads as the other powders BUT you still need to follow the data as published for that particular powder!
0 x

User avatar
BruniX
Cowhand
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:53 am
Location: Chevrolière , near Nantes
Contact:
France

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by BruniX » Thu Dec 27, 2018 3:35 pm

JEBar wrote:most reloading manuals have similar charts .... for me they provide interesting reading but I wouldn't use it as a single source for making a decision .... I prefer to go with the manual's specific recommendation as to the brand of powder and size of the powder charge
thanks jebar ! :)
0 x
"Those who forget the past are condemned to relive it"
W. Churchill


Shadow 2 SA - CZ
P08 - Luger
AR-15 - SDI
586 - S&W
97 - CZ
T3 Tac. - Tikka
1895 SBL - Marlin
1860 COLT - Pietta

User avatar
JEBar
Town Marshal / Deputy Admin
Posts: 19337
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
Location: central NC
United States of America

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by JEBar » Thu Dec 27, 2018 3:37 pm

hope you had a good Christmas .... just curious, have you loaded any rounds yet :?:
0 x

User avatar
CT_Shooter
Administrator emeritus
Posts: 5156
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 8:42 am
Location: Connecticut
United States of America

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by CT_Shooter » Thu Dec 27, 2018 3:53 pm

ADI in Australia produces gunpowder that is imported and labeled in the US as both Hodgdon and IMR. According to their website, these Hodgdon and IMR labeled powders are equivalent to ADI labeled powders.
ADI-powders.com wrote:
ADI exports a range of propellant to the US market where they are rebranded by Hodgdon Powder Company. We share reloading data and technical information with Hodgdon, which helps keep our products at the cutting edge of performance and quality, also the sizeable volumes of Aussie-made powder we export to the US help keep local manufacture economically viable.

ADI Powder Hodgdon / IMR naming
Trail Boss --- Trail Boss
AR2207 --- H4198
AR2219 --- H322
BM2 --- Benchmark
Bench Mark 8208 --- 8208 XBR
AR2206H --- H4895
AR2208 --- Varget
AR2209 --- H4350
AR2213H / AR2213SC --- H4831 / H4831SC
AR2217 --- H1000
AR2225 --- Retumbo
AR2218 --- H50BMG
http://www.adi-powders.com.au/faq/
1 x
H006M Big Boy Brass .357 - H001 Classic .22LR - Uberti / Taylors & Co. SmokeWagon .357 5.5" - Uberti / Taylors & Co. RanchHand .22LR 5.5"

User avatar
BruniX
Cowhand
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:53 am
Location: Chevrolière , near Nantes
Contact:
France

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by BruniX » Wed Jan 09, 2019 2:28 pm

JEBar wrote:hope you had a good Christmas .... just curious, have you loaded any rounds yet :?:
Not yet, i will wait to receive henry riffle before and test it with "standard ammo", federal, to see what is the recoil.

as I am careful and meticulous, I bought bullets for which I was sure to find reloading information:

- SI8900 Cal 45/70 FN 300 grs Pro Hunter SI8900
- Remington 45/70 405GR SP

Then, according to the information found in the lyman 50th edition,
I acquired the powder that could be suitable for a maximum of cases: imr 4198

I still have to buy the primers: cci 200 and starline 45-70 cases.

and I made two tables, one for each bullet for progressive charge :
Capture d’écran de 2019-01-09 19-13-01.png
Capture d’écran de 2019-01-09 19-13-01.png (175.07 KiB) Viewed 2404 times
Finally I will be very careful to respect
  the dimensions of the ammunition :
Capture d’écran de 2019-01-09 20-18-47.png
Capture d’écran de 2019-01-09 20-18-47.png (164.11 KiB) Viewed 2404 times
i wil inspect case after every shooting to check for signs of overpressure...

and with all that, I hope it will be fine!

if you see a stupidity in what I propose to do, do not hesitate to tell me! :?
0 x
"Those who forget the past are condemned to relive it"
W. Churchill


Shadow 2 SA - CZ
P08 - Luger
AR-15 - SDI
586 - S&W
97 - CZ
T3 Tac. - Tikka
1895 SBL - Marlin
1860 COLT - Pietta

User avatar
JEBar
Town Marshal / Deputy Admin
Posts: 19337
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm
Location: central NC
United States of America

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by JEBar » Wed Jan 09, 2019 3:30 pm

sounds to me like you are following a well thought-out process .... IMR 4198 is considered by many folks I know to be the consummate 45-70 powder .... follow the charges given in your reloading manual and you will do fine
3 x

User avatar
Flinch
Cowhand
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:07 pm
Location: Illinois
United States of America

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by Flinch » Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:35 pm

Starline brass is an excellent choice BruniX. When I competed in PPC years ago the top shooters were using Starline brass for their .38 Special target loads. I currently use it for my 45-70 target loads.
1 x
Be thankful we are not getting all the government we are paying for. - Will Rogers

220
Cattle Driver
Posts: 754
Joined: Sun May 13, 2018 11:11 pm
Australia

Re: equivalence of powders ?

Post by 220 » Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:37 pm

CT_Shooter wrote:ADI in Australia produces gunpowder that is imported and labeled in the US as both Hodgdon and IMR. According to their website, these Hodgdon and IMR labeled powders are equivalent to ADI labeled powders.
ADI-powders.com wrote:
ADI exports a range of propellant to the US market where they are rebranded by Hodgdon Powder Company. We share reloading data and technical information with Hodgdon, which helps keep our products at the cutting edge of performance and quality, also the sizeable volumes of Aussie-made powder we export to the US help keep local manufacture economically viable.

ADI Powder Hodgdon / IMR naming
Trail Boss --- Trail Boss
AR2207 --- H4198
AR2219 --- H322
BM2 --- Benchmark
Bench Mark 8208 --- 8208 XBR
AR2206H --- H4895
AR2208 --- Varget
AR2209 --- H4350
AR2213H / AR2213SC --- H4831 / H4831SC
AR2217 --- H1000
AR2225 --- Retumbo
AR2218 --- H50BMG
http://www.adi-powders.com.au/faq/
Spot on a lot of the ADI powders are relabeled for other markets in which case the data is interchangable. There are others as well win296/H110 springs to mind
1 x

Post Reply