True story -
A bar called Drummond's (in Mt Vernon, Texas) began construction on an expansion of their building, hoping to "grow" their business.
In response, the local Southern Baptist Church started a campaign to block the bar from expanding - petitions, prayers, etc.
About a week before the bar's grand re-opening, a bolt of lightning struck the bar and burned it to the ground!
Afterward, the church folks were rather smug - bragging about "the power of prayer".
The angry bar owner eventually sued the church on grounds that the church ...
"was ultimately responsible for the demise of his building, through direct actions or indirect means."
Of course, the church vehemently denied all responsibility or any connection to the building's demise.
The judge read carefully through the plaintiff's complaint and the defendant's reply. He then opened the hearing by saying:
"I don't know how I'm going to decide this, but it appears from the paperwork that what we have here is a bar owner who now
believes in the power of prayer, and an entire church congregation that does not."
RP
Spring has sprung. Get out and shoot your Henry
Texas Beer Joint sues local church over Lightning strike.
- Vaquero
- Ranch Boss
- Posts: 10334
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:56 am
- Location: Somewhere between Memphis & Nashville
Texas Beer Joint sues local church over Lightning strike.
1 x
Monte Walsh "You have No idea how little I care".
Ain't No Apologies for My Temperament
Si vis pacem, para bellum
H001, H006, H012
Ain't No Apologies for My Temperament
Si vis pacem, para bellum
H001, H006, H012
Re: Texas Beer Joint sues local church over Lightning strike.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
What I find interesting is the church's sudden denial of responsibility. I would think they would be proud of the outcome - considering they wanted to halt the development in the first place.
I am not passing judgment one way or another but I do believe the church has some culpability in this given they were using religious influence to interfere or halt a legal development.
How about if a church were to show up at an LGS and attempted to use petitions, prayers, etc. to somehow interfere with the right to legal gun ownership?
What I find interesting is the church's sudden denial of responsibility. I would think they would be proud of the outcome - considering they wanted to halt the development in the first place.
I am not passing judgment one way or another but I do believe the church has some culpability in this given they were using religious influence to interfere or halt a legal development.
How about if a church were to show up at an LGS and attempted to use petitions, prayers, etc. to somehow interfere with the right to legal gun ownership?
2 x